Maggie O'Kane, Executive Producer, tells the story revealed by the Guardian
documentary about the role of Col. James Steele in supporting torture, death
squads and brutal sectarian conflict during the height of the Iraq war. Steel's
reports went directly to Rumsfeld and Cheney.
PAUL JAY, SENIOR EDITOR, TRNN: Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm Paul Jay.
A new investigative documentary by The Guardian
and BBC tells a story of one Colonel James Steele, a veteran of the
Latin American Dirty War and the Vietnam War and his involvement in the
Iraq War. Apparently, Colonel Steele was involved in helping organize
and finance Shia death squads, torture, helping to instigate, perhaps,
the civil war in Iraq. His reports went directly to the desks of
Rumsfeld and Cheney.Now here's a trailer, five-minute
trailer from the documentary film. And after that, we'll meet the
executive producer of the project.~~~SOLDIER (SINGING): First to fight for the right and to build a nation right, and the army goes rolling along.NARRATOR: This is one of the great untold stories of the Iraq War, how
just over a year after the invasion, the United States funded a
sectarian police commando force that set up a network of torture centers
to fight the insurgency. It was a decision that helped fuel a sectarian
civil war between Shia and Sunni that ripped the country apart. At its
height, it was claiming 3,000 victims a month.This is also
the story of James Steele, the veteran of America's Dirty War in El
Salvador. He was in charge of the U.S. advisers who trained notorious
Salvadoran paramilitary units to fight left-wing guerrillas. In the
course of that civil war, 75,000 people died and over 1�million people
became refugees.Steele was chosen by the Bush
administration to work with General David Petraeus to organize these
paramilitary police commandos.This is the only known Iraqi video footage of Steele, a shadowy figure
always in the background observing, evaluating. The man on his left is
his collaborator, Colonel James Kaufmann. He reported directly to
General David Petraeus, who funded this police commando force from a
multibillion dollar fund. The thousands of commandos that
Steele let loose came to be mostly made up of Shia militias, like the
Badr Brigades, hungry to take revenge on the Sunni supporters of Saddam
Hussein.Steele oversaw the commandos, mostly made up of militias. They were torturing detainees for information on the insurgency.GILLES
PERESS, PHOTOJOURNALIST: He hears the scream of the other guy who's
being tortured, you know, as we speak. There is the blood stains in, you
know, the corner of the desk in front of him.GENERAL MUNTADHER AL-SAMARI, IRAQI MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, 2003-2005
(VOICEOVER TRANSL.): The things that went on there--drilling, murder,
torture, the ugliest sorts of torture I've ever seen.VOICEOVER:
The U.S. was desperate for information on the insurgency, and Steele's
expertise was turning that information obtained from thousands of
detainees into actionable intelligence.TODD GREENTREE, U.S. EMBASSY OFFICIAL, EL SALVADOR, 1980-1984: Colonel
Steele is one of the few people who understands how to conduct
intelligence-driven operations against operational cells of an
insurgency or terrorist organization.NARRATOR: The Iraqi
leader of these feared commandos was Adnan Thabit. In the city of
Samarrah, his commandos and their American advisers turned the main
library into a detention center, where torture was a routine occurrence.PERESS: We were in a room in the library interviewing Steele, and I was looking around. I see blood everywhere. You know.PETER
MAASS, NEW YORK TIMES JOURNALIST: There were these terrible screams.
There was somebody shouting, "Allah! Allah! Allah!" But it wasn't, you
know, kind of religious ecstasy or something like that; these were
screams of pain and terror.GENERAL ADNAN THABIT, COMMANDER OF SPECIAL POLICE COMMANDOS, 2004-2006
(VOICEOVER TRANSL.): The prisoners do start shouting. They are a bit
like whirling dervishes. They love to scream Allah, Allah.JERRY
BURKE, CHIEF POLICY ADVISER TO IRAQI MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, 2003-2004:
We lost the support of a lot of Iraqi citizens who became very cynical
and very anti-American. Even the ones who were friendly with us couldn't
understand why we were allowing this to happen.VOICEOVER:
The commandos quickly grew into a powerful 12,000-strong force with a
national network of torture centers. They became involved in death squad
activities. They were completely infiltrated by the Shia militias. But
General Petraeus claimed not to see that coming.LIEUTENANT
GENERAL DAVID PETRAEUS, MULTINATIONAL SECURITY TRANSITION COMMAND,
IRAQ, 2003-2005: We kept hearing this all the time, Martin, that--this
or that. To find the absolute evidence of this has actually been quidifficult.BURKE: Pretty much the whole world in Iraq knew
that the police commandos were Badr Brigade. He must have known about
the death squad activities. It was common knowledge across Baghdad.VOICEOVER: The Bush administration also denied any knowledge of these death squad activities.DONALD
RUMSFELD, U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: I've not seen reports that
hundreds are being killed by roving death squads at all. I'm not going
to get into speculation like that.VOICEOVER: But the
bodies were turning up every day on the streets of Baghdad. Many of the
victims were so badly tortured they could not be identified. Those who
couldn't be named found a final resting place in desolate town dumps
like this one. A rusty tin can marks each grave.James
Steele was decorated by Donald Rumsfeld for his work in Iraq. He lives
in Texas. He is registered with the Motivational Speakers Bureau to give
speeches about counterinsurgency and his experience in conflict zones.~~~JAY: Now joining us to talk about this investigative piece is the
executive producer and a member of the investigative journalist team,
Maggie O'Kane. She joins us from London. She's the multimedia editor of
investigations at The Guardian. As a former correspondent, she's
covered the world's major conflicts over the last decade. She's a former
British journalist of the year and a former foreign correspondent of
the year--awards given by British journalists.Thanks very much for joining us, Maggie.MAGGIE O'KANE, MULTIMEDIA EDITOR, THE GUARDIAN: Thank you. JAY:
It seems to me there's many--the film's very rich, and there's many
things we could talk about here, but people will watch the film, and
much of the detail they will get from that, from watching the film. But
one of the things that emerges for me is that in the United States
especially, the narrative here is that the primary role of the American
forces after overthrowing Saddam Hussein was to try to prevent civil
war, not add fuel to it. And at the very least, it seems to me, your
investigation makes the case that through the activities of Colonel
Steele, fuel was added, if not more than that.O'KANE: Well, I think what our investigation is saying--and I think it
shows quite clearly that a decision was made, not by retired colonel
Steele, but very much by the political hierarchy in the United States,
by Donald Rumsfeld, by General Petraeus, that actually in order to
combat the insurgency that was rising up unexpectedly against the
Americans, in order to combat that insurgency, which was mainly Sunni,
you would--they decided to arm what was essentially a Shia force called
the special police commandos. Now, when you make a
decision that you're going to take a sectarian force in a country that
has been rife with sectarian conflict and you decide to pour arms and
ammunition and support into a group that is clearly on one side, then
you're opening up a very, very dangerous tinderbox. Now, whether or not
that was the intention or whether or not that was a byproduct that the
United States didn't think about, then their main aim, as we understand
it, was to stop the attacks on American soldiers at whatever the price. So
I would not say that we could eliminate the possibility that there
would have been a civil war in Iraq anyway, but certainly the actions in
arming a sectarian force by Rumsfeld using people like Steele and
General Petraeus had catastrophic effects on Iraqi society. And the
height of the civil war in 2006, you know, you had 3,000 bodies a month
turning up a month from sectarian killings. It unleashed a hell, really,
on the country. JAY: Just to back--a little bit of context. This takes--the Sunni
attacks on American soldiers and a lot of, you could say, the conditions
that gave rise to the Americans wanting Shia forces to go and attack
Sunni, if you back up one step, after the fall of Saddam Hussein, my
understanding was there was a real attempt by Iraqis, both Shia and
Sunni, to have elections, to have a kind of normalization and move
forward, and the Americans de-Ba'athicised brutally, throwing all the
Sunnis out of any position they were in, held off elections for, what,
more than two�years. So it's not just that these forces started fighting
each other without some kind of context.O'KANE: Well, I
think the most important context in terms of the decisions that were
taken was, as you say, to basically sack the army and the police force.
So it was anyone who was a member of the Ba'ath Party. And if we make
comparisons, say, you know, in 1989 with the fall of communism,
everybody was in the Communist Party. If you wanted your kids to go to
school, they had to be in the Communist Party. It was exactly the same
in Iraq. If you wanted to make any progress in the civil service, in
education, in health, within any of the state structures, you had to be a
member of the Ba'ath Party.So by deciding to throw out
all of those people who were army and police and military, and, you
know, most of them ordinary, decent Iraqis trying to survive within the
system that they were under, you created a complete void. And into that
void--it was almost too late. By the time the Americans had discovered
that they had created this void, they suddenly had to fill it with a
tough sectarian force who would take on the Sunnis who were attacking
the American military there. Did they know this was inevitable? I
certainly have no evidence to suggest that. Was it recognized that this was a dangerous strategy to take? And we
know from speaking to high-ranking members of the Iraqi government that
they warned General Petraeus, that they warned the American
establishment or the American political leadership that if you continued
to arm a sectarian Shia force, if you handed it over to the Ministry of
the Interior, which at that time was being run by somebody who had a
pathological hatred of Sunnis--Solagh [j{b@rs om], had lost twelve
members of his own family, who'd been executed by Saddam Hussein, who
was a Sunni. So this man has been handed a force that was like a--that
was going to explode, which essentially it did. And there were warnings,
and they were given directly to General Petraeus. They were also given
to the American political establishment. And they were ignored.JAY:
Right. Now, again, the narrative here is the Sunnis were brutal and
violent and chopping people's heads off and such. And we got very little
reporting here of the torture and the brutality of some of the Shia
forces against the Sunni. But your investigation shows that Colonel
Steele was right in the midst of the use of this torture and that memos
of Steele were going directly to Rumsfeld. So it wasn't like this wasn't
known at the most senior levels.O'KANE: In a way it was almost more than that. I mean, retired colonel
Steele's job was to oversee some of the torture and detention centers.
We believe that there was 13 that existed, which were secret torture
centers, in which detainees were round up. Many of them had nothing to
do with the insurgency. And there was basically a torture processing
going on as a way to achieve human intelligence that then could be used
by the Americans and by the special police commandos to take on the
insurgency. So in a way it was quite organized. So the
knowledge--we believe, and we believe we've established in our
documentary, that Colonel Kaufmann, who reported directly to General
Petraeus, and retired colonel Steele were both fully aware of the
torture that was going on, and on occasion handed over lists of people
that they wanted picked up and tortured for information.JAY:
torture is a war crime. Colonel Steele, I can see from your film, has
actually been given awards, not arrested. I mean, doesn't your film lead
to the conclusion that there needs to be accountability not just for
Colonel Steele but people in the chain of command that were involved in
this kind of torture?O'KANE: I mean, our film is about laying out the facts. And the
difficulty has been that there's always been a sort of distance put
between the American military in this area and what the Iraqis
were--special commandos were carrying out. There was a sort of
deniability by distance. What we've sought to do is to use
a piece of investigative journalism to establish the relationships, to
hear from people who were inside these torture and detention centers
about what their relationship was with the American military, what
specifically was the role of retired colonel Steele and of Colonel
Kaufmann. And then, as I see it, as journalists our job was to lay out
the facts. You know. Then there needs to be questions
asked. I mean, one of the questions I would like to ask is why the
American mainstream media--with all due respect to yourself--but, you
know, why is there a reluctance to follow through on the evidence that
has been presented in this investigation, which has taken 17�months?
And, you know, maybe people want to forget about it. They're
not really questions for me. My job and the job of the team that I work
with is to get to the information and to get eyewitness accounts. And I
believe in that film we have laid out a pretty substantial case that
there is a case to answer.JAY: Yeah. We'll go ask some of those people. I mean, at The Real News
we haven't had problem following up on this, and we do regularly. But I
take your point: most of the media doesn't. Partly they took their cue
from President Obama, who said, let's look forward, not backwards, and
wouldn't allow any investigation into illegal activities. And with all
the evidence of torture in various investigations, there's been no
pursuit or prosecution.O'KANE: Well, I think one of the
things we felt was completely, you know, in a way fascinating, and at
times also very, very depressing, is that, you know, Colonel Steele
began his work in El Salvador in 1984, gathering human intelligence
there, which essentially is the same process. So we feel it's important
that you kind of--.Actually, having been a foreign
correspondent and a war correspondent, you find that this--there's a
whole language of euphemism which is about counterinsurgency, about
gathering human intelligence. You know, we are talking about torture. We
are talking about potentially igniting a civil war. And we really have
to learn these lessons, because there's been huge, huge suffering in
Iraq. And I say that as somebody who has made 17 or 18 films there. And I
feel that the legacy should be what we learn from these mistakes.JAY: Thanks very much for joining us, Maggie.O'KANE: Thank you very much for having me.JAY:
And if you're watching this not on the Real News site, you should come
to the Real News site, 'cause we're going to play the whole film. And
there's--also, if you go to the Guardian site, you will find a lot of other backup material that's accompanying their display of the film. So thank you for joining us on The Real News Network.
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Documentary Exposes US Role in Iraq Sectarian Conflict
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment